Vistaprint? Not so much
22 December 2009 | 16:06 | General | No Comments
As Christmas was rapidly approaching, I decided to get off my butt and make a calendar of African animals to give out to the family.
With a bit of research (albeit not too much), what appeared to be a reasonable option was Vistaprint (who – as I found out later – have no aussie presence despite the misleading http://www.vistaprint.com.au/ url). I paid the premium to get the 9 days delivery and stumbled across it on the 10th day. The parcel was sitting in the hallway – not outside (or even that close to) my door – so it may have been sitting there for days.
With mild anticipation I opened the parcel and was pretty disapointed with what I found.
1. Many of the corners were curled up
2. The colours were not consistent across copies
3. Nearly 1/2 of them have a stain on the front
See the comparison below:
I know I should have tested out various printers but I really didn’t give myself the time I should have. Maybe Vistaprint was rushing through holiday orders and uncharacteristically dropped the ball, all I know is they quality as bad as this wont be getting my business anymore.
Make them pay – literally
31 May 2009 | 21:40 | General, Humour | No Comments
Ahh – gotta love those crazy guys from The Pirate Bay!
In an attempt to put (financial) pressure on the law firm which opposed them in their recent court case, co-founder of TPB Gottfrid Svartholm Warg has recommended a strategy he is calling Distributed Denial of Dollars attack (DDo$).
After discovering the bank being used to faciliate online payments will charge (after an initial free 1000 transactions) 2 Swedish kronors (about 25c US) per transaction, Gottfrid is recommending everyone pay them 1 SEK online which should result in them owing the bank 1 SEK instead of receiving 1 SEK for each transaction.
Additionally the overhead incurred due to each transaction having to be handled by hand (due to the small size of the firm) will have the added bonus of costing time and productivity.
Maybe not something I’d recommend – but full marks for thinking outside the box!
Getting things out
24 April 2009 | 1:55 | General | No Comments
Are you like me? I have hobbies. I have things I like to do. I have things that I know I will appreciate having done. But somehow it’s easier to not.
I think for me it’s a lot about my perception of completeness. I think about things and think about the effort required to get them to a state where they can be considered “finished” and it never seems like something that can be achieved without considerable effort. But how complete is complete? How good is good enough? I don’t really know but are beginning to realise that while “pretty good” is far from “perfect” – it is way better than nothing at all.
So I’m not talking about getting things done – I’m talking about getting things out. Procrastination and perfectionist pretences make it all too easy to start things and never complete them, but if you have to publish, you will either work your ass off or take a more pragmatic approach and rationalise the appropriate effort for the underlying value.
I’ve come to the conclusion that without an internal commitment/schedule (and possibly the fear of ridicule), I will more often than not adopt the “I’ll do that later” attitude (also known as the “I’d rather watch TV” attitude).
Well that all ends today (wow – them’s fighting words!)
As I’m nether industrious nor delusional, but am committed, I intend to adopt the 1-a-week policy.
This means:
1 photo taken and published to flickr a week
1 blog post written and published a week
Hell – I might even throw in “wash the dishes at least once a week” too – just for the fun of it!
Well – I guess I’ve done my blog post. And have published this weeks photo to flickr (see my 1 a week set on flickr). I better go do the dishes.
I wonder how long it will last – wish me luck!
Plasma vs LCD
19 July 2006 | 19:19 | Entertainment, General | 3 Comments
Whilst trying to discover the “correct” new TV for myself, I found I had to wade though lots of information in order to verify (or debunk) myths and identify the distinguishing points.
My conclusions are based on researching the following:
Plasma:
Panasonic VIERA TH-42PV60A
Hitachi 42PD8900TA
LCD:
Sony BRAVIA KLVV40A10
Samsung LA40R71BD
Myths:
1) Plasma TVs have better viewing angles.
It seems that current plasma and LCD TVs both have viewing angles in the range of 170 – 180 degrees.
2) Plasma TVs have less motion blur during fast moving footage.
While this is still correct, good LCD TVs tend to have at most 8ms response times, so this is only noticeable to the most attentive viewer.
3) LCD TVs have a longer lifespan.
This too is generally true but it is becoming much of a muchness. Good plasma TVs boast a comparable 50 – 60,000 hour lifespan these days; are you really going to be watching the same TV in 20 years time?
4) LCD TVs have higher native resolutions.
This is only sort of true. An HD plasma TV is likely to have a resolution such as 1024 x 768 or 1024 x 1080. Competing LCD TVs would have a resolution more like 1366 x 768. In pixels there is not much between the 1024 x 1080 plasma and the LCD, and even if there was this would only be noticeable if you are connecting a non-video source (such as a computer) to it. They will generally both handle 720p and 1080i content and more likely that not also handle 1080p.
Truths:
1) Plasma is susceptible to screen burn.
This is true, but can be mitigated with good management. Try not to leave static images on your screen for more than an hour, and don’t pause a DVD (for example) for more than 20 minutes. This is particularly important during the first 200 hours while the phosphors are still fresh. Try to watch 4:3 content in full screen so you have no black bars to burn in.
2) LCD is more expensive.
Once you reach the 42″ size, this is still true, however sometimes you can get a good deal on a 40″ LCD which brings it to a price comparable with a 42″ plasma.
3) Plasma has better colour/contrast.
This is generally true and people who like bright screens should see the next point. Common plasma contrast ratios range between 4,000:1 and 10,000:1 where LCD is more likely to give you between 1,000:1 and 5,000:1. Plasmas also tend to have more uniformity (evenness) in brightness and colour from corner to corner.
4) LCD’s provide better daylight viewing.
Both the fact that LCD’s are generally brighter than plasma’s and don’t have plasma’s reflective screens make LCD’s easier to see and less prone to screen glare than plasma.
5) LCD’s consume less power.
This would be truer if phrased as “LCD’s consume MUCH less power”. LCD’s generally consume anywhere between 30-50% less power than plasmas. As an additional consequence, plasmas get hotter than LCD and generally have cooling fans – some that are quite audible.
I’m confused – is there a winner?
In order to find the one that’s right for you, you need to do 2 things:
1) Compare the technologies
2) Identify the model with the features you need
Comparison Points:
Picture:
Are you likely to watch much in daylight? Do you generally watch with lights on that would reflect on the screen? If so you have to lean towards LCD – but remember you are sacrificing the colour and contrast when you are watching in optimal conditions. Would you rather the experience is great while watching in daylight/lights on and average in low light or average in daylight/lights on and great in low light?
Price/Cost:
Plasma is generally cheaper than LCD at the 40″ (LCD) – 42″ (plasma) size. This gap is even greater if you want to go to bigger (such as 50″). If price is a consideration (and let’s be honest – when isn’t it?), this should be acknowledged as a factor. Don’t forget that the price isn’t the whole cost though – with an LCD using 50% less power you may find this cost saving a factor.
Resolution:
Are you going to be using the TV to do more than watch video content such as act as a computer monitor? If so, this should only be a factor if you find an LCD TV with a much greater resolution.
Features:
Inputs/Outputs:
Does the TV have all the connections you need? Does it have HDMI? If so how many?
Tuner:
Do you need a tuner (i.e. are not going to feed it from a cable box/digital stb/media center)? If so what type (analogue/standard digital/HD digital)? Do you “NEED” 2 tuners?
Conclusion
These are just the facts. Personal perceptions and tastes should always weigh more heavily than technical differences.
For most people I believe it should be a simple 3 step process:
1) Identify the features you NEED from the Features list above
2) Determine how much you can afford / are happy to spend
3) Go to as many stores are you can and look at the TVs within your budget that have the features you need
I’m sure you will not be disappointed – and if you are it’s because your budget was set to low 